The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish the project and working group
|
|
Applicable policies and procedures, reports, records and emergency risk assessments are located and analysed Completed |
Evidence:
|
A working group is established with an appropriate balance of expertise, representation and authority Completed |
Evidence:
|
Group's knowledge of emergency risk management principles, terminology and processes is confirmed Completed |
Evidence:
|
A sustainable emergency risk management process is negotiated that suits the community context and capability, stakeholder needs and practical constraints Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feasible consultation and project management strategies are developed with stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Need for specialised information, additional skills and expertise is identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Confirm risks to be considered
|
|
Existing risk assessment is reviewed for continuing relevance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sources of risk are identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Responsibility for single agency or multi-agency management of risks is identified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Set of risks given to the group are considered and the group's composition and stakeholder needs are reassessed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify possible treatment options
|
|
Effectiveness of existing prevention, preparedness, response and recovery strategies is established through research and stakeholder consultation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Community vulnerability is reconsidered as a basis for identifying treatment options Completed |
Evidence:
|
A wide range of potential treatment options is identified through researching current best practice, alternative options, and seeking specialist opinion Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine feasible treatment options
|
|
An agreed set of assessment criteria for treatment options that takes into account practical constraints, effectiveness and equity is developed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Treatment options are assessed and the risks and implications for stakeholders are identified for each option Completed |
Evidence:
|
Treatment options are documented so that they are understandable by a wide range of audiences Completed |
Evidence:
|
Feedback on likely implications and impacts of treatment options is obtained from agencies, organisations, the community and other stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholder needs are analysed, concerns considered and solutions negotiated Completed |
Evidence:
|
A refined set of treatment options is developed that incorporates stakeholder feedback Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommend preferred treatment options for each risk
|
|
Preferred treatment options are selected in consultation with stakeholders and their commitment to the recommendations is obtained Completed |
Evidence:
|
Preferred treatment options are documented, detailing the basis of recommendations, resource implications and commitment of stakeholders for each Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recommendations are submitted for approval in accordance with applicable policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Promote ongoing commitment and ownership for the process and outcomes
|
|
Consultation is undertaken at all stages of the process using a wide range of networks and individuals Completed |
Evidence:
|
A variety of communication strategies is used Completed |
Evidence:
|
All stages of the process, decisions taken and outcomes are documented accurately in accordance with relevant policy and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Information is provided to the community in ways that suit their language, literacy and cultural needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor and review the process
|
|
All relevant data and contact information for key individuals and organisations is regularly reviewed for currency and updated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Treatment options are reviewed for continuing relevance Completed |
Evidence:
|
Opportunities for improving emergency risk management processes are reported Completed |
Evidence:
|